What happens when the home you bought turns out to be not quite what you expected? Perhaps the roof leaks or there is a rodent infestation. Maybe the plumbing is faulty or the construction defective. What recourse does a purchaser have against the vendor?
The critical question is what disclosure obligations the vendor has when selling their property. As is often the case in legal matters, there are competing principles at play in determining who bears the loss for such defects. In many cases, a purchaser should retain an inspector to inspect the property and the failure to do so cannot shift blame to the vendor.
A competing principle is consumer protection. This means the court will intervene to prevent fraud and non-innocent misrepresentation where a purchaser has been lied to about a property’s condition. However, the court may also intervene where a vendor has failed to disclose material (meaning dangerous) latent defects about the property that they knew about or ought to have known about. A latent defect is one that is not discoverable by a purchaser through reasonable inspection and inquiry. But not every latent defect will result in a remedy against a vendor. It must be a defect of “substance” that makes the property uninhabitable or dangerous.
Most residential sales involve the vendor providing a Property Disclosure Statement (PDS). A PDS is meant to identify any problems or concerns with the property, not to give detailed comments in answer to the questions posed. A vendor need only say that they are or are not aware of problems. When completing a PDS, a vendor must correctly and honestly disclose their current actual knowledge about the property, but that knowledge does not have to be correct. The contents of a PDS are representations upon which a purchaser can rely.
If you are caught up in the residential real estate frenzy, remember that generally it is “buyer beware”. Before you close a purchase, properly inspect the property and, if necessary, retain professionals to help you. As a purchaser, if you want a promise of fitness for the home you are going to buy, your safest bet is to negotiate express warranties by the vendor to that effect by the vendor.
Source: http://www.westerncanadabusinesslitigationblog.com/real-estate/1357/?utm_source=Mondaq&utm_medium=syndication&utm_campaign=View-Original
Wednesday, 1 June 2016
Thursday, 19 May 2016
April home sales set record, Canadian Real Estate Association says
The number of homes sold in Canada last month hit a record as supply tightened. There were 57,669 homes sold nationwide over the Multiple Listing Service in April, a 10.3 per cent increase from the same month last year, according to the Canadian Real Estate Association .
The rise in sales came as the number of new homes put up for sale slipped 3.7 per cent from a year ago to 103,028. Compared with March, sales were up 3.1 per cent in April, while new listings declined 0.2 per cent.
The national average price for homes sold in April rose 13.1 per cent from a year ago to $508,097.
Excluding the greater Vancouver and greater Toronto markets, the average price was $369,222, up 8.7 per cent from April 2015.
The national sales-to-new listings ratio rose to 64.5 per cent in April, the ratio’s tightest reading since October 2009.
Source: http://www.news1130.com/2016/05/16/april-home-sales-set-record-mark-canadian-real-estate-association-says/
The rise in sales came as the number of new homes put up for sale slipped 3.7 per cent from a year ago to 103,028. Compared with March, sales were up 3.1 per cent in April, while new listings declined 0.2 per cent.
The national average price for homes sold in April rose 13.1 per cent from a year ago to $508,097.
Excluding the greater Vancouver and greater Toronto markets, the average price was $369,222, up 8.7 per cent from April 2015.
The national sales-to-new listings ratio rose to 64.5 per cent in April, the ratio’s tightest reading since October 2009.
Source: http://www.news1130.com/2016/05/16/april-home-sales-set-record-mark-canadian-real-estate-association-says/
Saturday, 7 May 2016
How to use your RRSP to invest in real estate
As the Canadian real estate market continues to rise, some investors want to put their RRSP money to work in a real estate investment. While there are limitations, there are also several options available to investors.
Unfortunately, those looking to buy a rental property with their RRSPs are out of luck. Tax-free RRSP withdrawals of up to $25,000 can be taken under the Home Buyer’s Plan (HBP) to buy or build a qualifying primary residence to live in, but not for a rental property investment.
Real estate investment trusts (REITs) are RRSP-eligible investments that pool together income-generating real estate. Typically the pool includes residential, office, retail, industrial, self-storage, healthcare or hotel properties. REITs are a way for investors to invest indirectly in real estate that is managed by a professional team.
It is also possible to hold your own mortgage in your RRSP, effectively making you your own lender. Fees may be a couple thousand dollars on set-up and then a couple hundred dollars a year thereafter.
For conservative investors, it can be an enticing option because the mortgage rate used is the posted rate, which guarantees you a much higher fixed return than you could otherwise earn on a GIC or high-quality bond. That said, it means you are borrowing at a higher rate – albeit from yourself – than you could otherwise borrow from a bank.
One concern with holding your mortgage in your RRSP is that if you could otherwise borrow at a lower rate of interest and possibly invest at a higher rate of return in a balanced investment portfolio, you might be missing out twice. This is especially true at today’s low interest rates, in particular when you take into account the up-front and ongoing costs.
Anyone considering a real estate investment given the long run-up in Canadian real estate prices should consider their existing exposure to real estate, not only through their stocks and mutual funds, but also their primary residence.
Many Canadians have a high allocation to real estate already in their net worth without targeting real estate specifically in their RRSPs, so use proper asset allocation as the primary test to determine if you should be investing further in real estate in the first place.
Source: Financial Post
Unfortunately, those looking to buy a rental property with their RRSPs are out of luck. Tax-free RRSP withdrawals of up to $25,000 can be taken under the Home Buyer’s Plan (HBP) to buy or build a qualifying primary residence to live in, but not for a rental property investment.
Real estate investment trusts (REITs) are RRSP-eligible investments that pool together income-generating real estate. Typically the pool includes residential, office, retail, industrial, self-storage, healthcare or hotel properties. REITs are a way for investors to invest indirectly in real estate that is managed by a professional team.
It is also possible to hold your own mortgage in your RRSP, effectively making you your own lender. Fees may be a couple thousand dollars on set-up and then a couple hundred dollars a year thereafter.
For conservative investors, it can be an enticing option because the mortgage rate used is the posted rate, which guarantees you a much higher fixed return than you could otherwise earn on a GIC or high-quality bond. That said, it means you are borrowing at a higher rate – albeit from yourself – than you could otherwise borrow from a bank.
One concern with holding your mortgage in your RRSP is that if you could otherwise borrow at a lower rate of interest and possibly invest at a higher rate of return in a balanced investment portfolio, you might be missing out twice. This is especially true at today’s low interest rates, in particular when you take into account the up-front and ongoing costs.
Anyone considering a real estate investment given the long run-up in Canadian real estate prices should consider their existing exposure to real estate, not only through their stocks and mutual funds, but also their primary residence.
Many Canadians have a high allocation to real estate already in their net worth without targeting real estate specifically in their RRSPs, so use proper asset allocation as the primary test to determine if you should be investing further in real estate in the first place.
Source: Financial Post
Sunday, 27 March 2016
Examining opportunities in the student housing market
The Canadian housing market and where it is headed has
been the subject of heated debate among investors and Canadians in general for
several years now. Among the countless stakeholders in this important issue are
students of Canadian universities and colleges across the country. As of 2013,
there were 950,000 full-time students enrolled in 82 of the largest educational
institutions across Canada, a number that has since grown closer to one
million. Obviously housing is an important factor in the decision-making
process of students and one that is not taken lightly considering the cost.
This holds particularly true for international students seeking an education in
Canada. In fact, the international student market comprised approximately $8
billion in Canada as of 2014, factoring in both tuition and living expenses.
This group accounts for approximately 10 per cent of full-time university
students across the country.
Investors have taken notice of this high demand for
affordable student housing. In the “university towns” of Waterloo, London and
Guelph, private groups have long been interested in building and developing
units for students. Students are often more willing to rent by the bed as
opposed to entire units. This provides further income to property owners as
they are able to generate more revenue from a single unit. It is not only
private investors who have taken notice to this opportunity but also the
universities and colleges themselves.
Based on this information, it is clear that an
opportunity presents itself in the rental housing market. Both domestic and
international student numbers keep growing.
Sunday, 21 February 2016
Mortgage rules requiring more than 5% down on Canadian homes over $500K
Starting this month you'll need to put upwards five per cent down on a home selling for more than $500,000 in Canada. The new mortgage rules, announced last December by Finance Minister Bill Morneau, dictate that buyers must put down 10 per cent down on the portion of the home's price above $500,0000. The move's intended to keep housing prices affordable for anyone wishing to enter some of Canada's hottest real estate markets.
Buyers can still put down five per cent for homes $500,000 and under. For example, if you want to buy a $750,000 home, you'll need to have a minimum down payment of $50,000, which is what you get when you add five per cent of $500,000 and 10 per cent of the remaining $250,000.
Buyers can still put down five per cent for homes $500,000 and under. For example, if you want to buy a $750,000 home, you'll need to have a minimum down payment of $50,000, which is what you get when you add five per cent of $500,000 and 10 per cent of the remaining $250,000.
Homes that cost more than $1 million still require a 20 per cent down payment.
Wednesday, 6 January 2016
How virtual reality could better connect buyers with properties for sale
Canadian real estate could soon be donning
headsets and touring upcoming condo developments in virtual reality by turning
floor plans of new developments into 3D, immersive mockups that can be experienced
in virtual reality, according to the founder of a Toronto-based technology
firm. Potential buyers can now, from the comfort of their own home, view any
floor plan that they want, with the finishes they want, and feel like they're
actually inside that home.
Rather than building model suites, the
building company uses technology to create virtual reality mockups of its
upcoming development providing a significant cost saving for the company.
While the appeal of immersive tours for
foreign buyers is obvious, REALTORS note that the technology has benefits for
local home buyers, as well. For example, it can help a home-hunter narrow down
his or her list of options, ultimately cutting down on the amount of time spent
driving around town touring homes.
Source: CTV news
Tuesday, 15 December 2015
First-Time Home Buyers Take Financially Fit, Well-Informed Approach
First-time
homebuyers are doing their homework and making responsible financial decisions
entering Canada's housing
market, according to a new study released by Genworth Canada. The 2015
Genworth Canada – First-Time Homeownership Study shows that the typical
first-time homebuyer is well-educated, employed, consulting with mortgage
industry professionals and purchasing a home within financial reach.
Source: Genworth Canada
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
